Proses ekstradisi adalah cukup rumit dan melibatkan pelbagai faktor seperti hubungan diplomatik, pertimbangan undang-undang dan dinamika politik antara negara. Keputusan untuk mengekstradisi seseorang biasanya bergantung kepada perjanjian ekstradisi bersama, undang-undang domestik dan keadaan khusus kes tersebut.
Dalam kes Jho Low, jika beliau memang berada di China, keputusan untuk mengekstradisinya akan melibatkan perbincangan dan negosiasi antara pihak berkuasa Malaysia dan China. Kedua-dua negara perlu menilai bukti yang ada, menilai aspek undang-undang kes tersebut dan mempertimbangkan kepentingan nasional masing-masing sebelum membuat keputusan mengenai ekstradisi.
Perlu diingatkan bahawa terdapat faktor lain yang mungkin memainkan peranan dan tidak didedahkan secara umum menjadikannya sukar untuk berspekulasi mengenai alasan tepat mengapa China mungkin mengizinkan atau tidak mengizinkan ekstradisi Jho Low.
Menangkap Jho Low dan membawanya kembali ke Malaysia terbukti mencabar disebabkan beberapa faktor:
1. Lokasi yang tidak diketahui: Jho Low telah berjaya mengelakkan penangkapan selama beberapa tahun dan berjaya menyembunyikan lokasi keberadaannya. Beliau dilaporkan sering berpindah tempat tinggal dan menggunakan pelbagai cara untuk menyembunyikan jejaknya, termasuk menggunakan identiti palsu. Keberadaannya yang tidak diketahui membuat operasi penangkapan menjadi lebih rumit.
2. Kerjasama antarabangsa: Jho Low dilaporkan berada di pelbagai negara di seluruh dunia. Proses menangkap dan mengekstradisinya melibatkan kerjasama antarabangsa antara kerajaan Malaysia dan negara-negara di mana beliau diduga berada. Terdapat prosedur undang-undang dan politik yang perlu diikuti dalam kerjasama ini, dan tidak semua negara mungkin bersedia atau mampu bekerja sama secara efektif.
3. Sumber daya dan kepakaran yang diperlukan: Menangkap seorang pelarian yang bersembunyi memerlukan sumber daya yang besar dan kepakaran penyiasatan yang tinggi. Untuk menangkap Jho Low, pihak berkuasa perlu mengumpul maklumat intelijen yang tepat, mengesan keberadaannya dan melibatkan pasukan terlatih dalam operasi penangkapan. Kadang-kadang, proses ini memerlukan waktu yang lama dan sumber kewangan yang besar.
4. Perlindungan undang-undang dan penentangan: Jho Low memiliki sumber daya kewangan yang besar dan diketahui menggunakan kekayaannya untuk mendapatkan perlindungan undang-undang dan menghadapi proses perundangan. Beliau mungkin memiliki rangkaian dan sumber daya yang membantu menjaga status quo dan mengelakkan penangkapan.
Pernyataan yang menyatakan Malaysia tidak memiliki keberanian dan keseriusan untuk menangkap Jho Low dengan bantuan agensi penguat undang-undang antarabangsa mengimplikasikan bahawa mungkin ada keraguan untuk bertindak kerana nilai tinggi kekayaan Jho Low sebagai sumber kewangan negara tersebut.
Penangkapan dan ekstradisi individu yang terlibat dalam skandal kewangan antarabangsa seperti Jho Low merupakan proses yang kompleks dan melibatkan pertimbangan undang undang, diplomasi, dan keperluan logistik yang besar. Diperlukan masa dan kerjasama antara negara-negara yang berbeza untuk berhasil menangkap dan menghadirkan buruan ini ke muka pengadilan.
Kerajaan dan pihak berkuasa biasanya bekerja dalam kerangka undang undang yang ditetapkan dan protokol antarabangsa ketika mengejar individu yang terlibat dalam kegiatan jenayah. Proses ini sering melibatkan pengumpulan bukti yang mencukupi, penggunaan sistem perundangan secara maksimum dan memperolehi kerjasama dari negara lain.
Penting untuk menghormati prinsip ‘due process’ dan mematuhi prosedur undang-undang dalam menangani kes seperti ini.
Pada akhirnya, keefektifan dan keefisiensi usaha menangkap individu seperti Jho Low bergantung kepada pelbagai faktor terutamanya kerjasama antarabangsa, pembuktian yang sahih pertimbangan politik dan peruntukan kewangan yang mencukupi.
Pendapat tambahan daripada Dr Rozaidi Razali, Timbalan Presiden MCW…
Menurut pendapat saya, menangkap Jho Low oleh pihak berkuasa Malaysia melibatkan cabaran yang besar atas beberapa sebab:
Pertama, Jho Low merupakan individu yang mempunyai hubungan yang kukuh dan sumber kewangan yang melimpah. Beliau terbukti bijak dalam mengelakkan penangkapan dengan menggunakan rangkaian yang kompleks dan strategi yang canggih untuk menyembunyikan kedudukannya.
Ia mengingatkan saya kepada filem “Catch Me If You Can” – dengan lakon utama Leonardo DiCaprio. Cerita tentang seorang penipu terkenal bernama Frank Abagnale yang berjaya menipu orang dengan nilai jutaan dolar melalui seni penipuan yang mahir. Ini hampir sama dengan cara yang digunakan oleh Jho Low.
Kedua, Jho Low didakwa terlibat dalam pengubahan wang haram dan menggunakan akaun luar pesisir, menjadikannya sukar untuk mengesan aktiviti kewangannya. Ini membolehkannya memindahkan aset di pelbagai bidang kuasa, yang lebih memrumitkan usaha pihak berkuasa Malaysia untuk merampas asetnya atau membatasi pergerakannya.
Selain itu, Jho Low dilaporkan memperoleh beberapa pasport dan kewarganegaraan, yang membolehkannya pergi di antara negara dengan mudah dan berpotensi memanfaatkan kelemahan undang-undang. Tindakan ini membuat tugas pihak berkuasa dalam menjejaki pergerakannya dan menyelaraskan usaha penangkapannya menjadi cabaran besar.
Jho Low juga diketahui menggunakan pasukan pakar undang-undang untuk menentang permintaan ekstradisi dan proses undang-undang yang dihadapinya. Strategi pertahanan undang-undang ini memanjangkan proses dan menjadikannya lebih sukar bagi pihak berkuasa untuk membawa beliau ke muka pengadilan.
Terakhir, kes Jho Low telah menarik perhatian antarabangsa yang signifikan dan melibatkan beberapa bidang kuasa. Mengoordinasikan usaha dan menavigasi sistem undang-undang yang kompleks antara negara-negara yang berbeza memerlukan masa dan kerjasama daripada pelbagai agensi penguatkuasaan undang-undang.
Secara keseluruhan, gabungan sumber daya Jho Low, kebolehan dia mengelakkan penemuan, penggunaan akaun luar pesisir, pemilikan beberapa pasport, strategi pertahanan undang-undang, dan kompleksiti antarabangsa menyumbang kepada kesulitan yang dihadapi oleh pihak berkuasa Malaysia dalam usaha menangkapnya.
To effectively catch Jho Low from his hiding place, Malaysian authorities can take several measures: (Part of my suggestion)
Strengthen International Cooperation: Malaysian authorities should collaborate closely with law enforcement agencies in other countries where Jho Low may be hiding. Sharing intelligence, coordinating efforts, and establishing extradition agreements can enhance the chances of capturing him.
Enhanced Surveillance and Intelligence Gathering: Authorities should employ advanced surveillance techniques, both online and offline, to gather information about Jho Low’s whereabouts and activities. This can include monitoring his financial transactions, communication channels, and social networks to gather crucial leads.
Deploy Specialized Task Forces: Establishing dedicated task forces composed of skilled investigators, financial experts, and legal professionals can focus specifically on apprehending Jho Low. These teams should be adequately trained and equipped to handle complex cases like his.
Freeze and Seize Assets: Malaysian authorities should work with international counterparts to freeze Jho Low’s assets worldwide. This can disrupt his financial capabilities, limit his resources, and create additional pressure for him to be apprehended.
Utilize Interpol Red Notice: Authorities can issue an Interpol Red Notice, which is an international arrest warrant, to alert law enforcement agencies worldwide about Jho Low. This can increase the chances of his capture if he attempts to travel internationally.
Offer Rewards and Incentives: Offering substantial rewards for information leading to Jho Low’s arrest can encourage individuals with knowledge of his whereabouts to come forward. Whistleblower protection programs can also be established to ensure their safety.
Strengthen Border Controls: Collaborating with immigration authorities to strengthen border controls can prevent Jho Low from leaving or entering the country undetected. Close monitoring of airports, ports, and border checkpoints is crucial.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Engaging the public through media campaigns and social platforms can generate awareness about Jho Low and his crimes. This may lead to potential sightings or valuable tips from individuals who recognize him.
Leverage Technological Solutions: Employing advanced technologies like facial recognition systems, data analytics, and artificial intelligence can assist in identifying Jho Low’s whereabouts or connections. FBI is very good in this.
Bak kata perpatah Melayu kita translate in English = Willing to exert a thousand efforts, unwilling to make a thousand excuses.
DRR
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MCW Opinion on Jho Low extradition back to Malaysia.
It’s important to note that extradition processes are complex and can involve various factors such as diplomatic relations, legal considerations, and political dynamics between countries. The decision t
o extradite an individual typically depends on bilateral extradition agreements, domestic laws, and the specific circumstances of the case.
In the case of Jho Low, if he is indeed in China, the decision to extradite him would involve discussions and negotiations between the Malaysian and Chinese authorities. Both countries would need to assess the available evidence, evaluate the legal aspects of the case, and consider their respective national interests before making a decision on extradition.
It’s also worth mentioning that there may be other factors at play that are not publicly disclosed, making it difficult to speculate on the exact reasons why China may or may not allow Jho Low’s extradition.
Capturing Jho Low and bringing him back to Malaysia has proven to be challenging due to several reasons:
1. Unknown whereabouts: Jho Low has managed to evade capture for several years and has successfully hidden his location. He has been reported to move frequently and has utilized various methods to conceal his tracks, including using false identities. His unknown whereabouts make the arrest operation more complicated.
2. International cooperation: Jho Low has been reported to be in various countries worldwide. The process of capturing and extraditing him involves international cooperation between the Malaysian government and the countries where he is believed to be residing. There are legal and political procedures that need to be followed in this cooperation, and not all countries may be willing or capable of effectively collaborating.
3. Required resources and expertise: Arresting a fugitive in hiding requires significant resources and high-level investigative expertise. To apprehend Jho Low, authorities need to gather accurate intelligence, track his location, and involve trained teams in the apprehension operation. Sometimes, this process takes a considerable amount of time and extensive resources.
4. Legal protection and resistance: Jho Low possesses significant financial resources and is suspected of using his wealth to seek legal protection and resist the judicial process. He may have networks and resources that help maintain the status quo and evade capture.
The suggestions that Malaysia lacks the courage and seriousness to arrest Jho Low with the assistance of international law enforcement agencies implies that there may be a reluctance to take action due to Jho Low’s potential value as a “cash cow” or a source of financial benefits.
The arrest and extradition of an individual involved in an international financial scandal like Jho Low can be a complex process, involving various legal, diplomatic, and logistical considerations. It may take time and collaboration between multiple countries to successfully apprehend and bring a fugitive to justice.
Governments and law enforcement agencies typically work within established legal frameworks and international protocols when pursuing individuals involved in criminal activities. These processes often require gathering sufficient evidence, navigating legal systems, and obtaining cooperation from other jurisdictions. It’s important to respect the principles of due process and adhere to legal procedures when dealing with such cases.
Ultimately, the effectiveness and efficiency of efforts to arrest individuals like Jho Low depend on a multitude of factors, including international cooperation, availability of evidence, political considerations, and resource allocation.
Personal opinion from Dr Rozaidi Razali, MCW Deputy Presiden 1…
In my opinion, capturing Jho Low by Malaysian authorities poses significant challenges for several reasons:
Firstly, Jho Low is a well-connected individual with extensive resources at his disposal. He has proven to be adept at evading capture by utilizing complex networks and employing sophisticated strategies to conceal his whereabouts.
It reminds me of one movie known as “Catch Me If You Can” – the main actor Leonardo DiCaprio.
A story about a Notorious con artist Frank Abagnale has duped people worth millions of dollars with his masterful art of deception. This is almost identical modest operandi used by Jho Low.
Secondly, Jho Low is believed to have engaged in money laundering and utilized offshore accounts, making it difficult to trace his financial activities. This allows him to move assets across different jurisdictions, further complicating the efforts of Malaysian authorities to seize his assets or restrict his movements.
Moreover, Jho Low has reportedly obtained multiple passports and citizenships, enabling him to travel across countries with ease and potentially exploit legal loopholes. These actions make it challenging for authorities to track his movements and coordinate efforts for his arrest.
Additionally, Jho Low has been known to employ a team of legal experts and utilize their services to challenge extradition requests and legal proceedings against him. This legal defense strategy further prolongs the process and makes it harder for authorities to bring him to justice.
Lastly, Jho Low’s case has garnered significant international attention and involves multiple jurisdictions. Coordinating efforts and navigating complex legal systems between different countries require time and cooperation from various law enforcement agencies.
Overall, the combination of Jho Low’s resources, ability to evade detection, utilization of offshore accounts, possession of multiple passports, legal defense strategies, and international complexities contribute to the difficulty faced by Malaysian authorities in capturing him.